April 19, 2021 Executive Session Directors Report

April 19, 2021 Executive Session Directors Report

Directors Report

Executive Session

April 19 , 2021

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MONDAY, APRIL 19, 2021 VIRTUAL (Video/Phone) AGENDA (Board Version) EXECUTIVE SESSION – 9:30 A.M. PT https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86203861239

I.

CALL TO ORDER A. Minutes – None B. Legal 1. Quick Orientation – Legal Counsel to Attend 2. Petitions – Legal Counsel a. Monarch Ball - Attached b. Can/Am Tournament - Attached C. Contracts – Oral Reports 1. WiFi – Internet Planet to Attend

2. Food & Beverage 3. Convenience Store 4. Salon 5. Real Estate/Rentals D. Member Delinquencies/Discipline 1. Delinquency Report – Attached

2. Lien Filings - Attached 3. Hearing Date - Attached

E. Personnel 1. Committee Appointments – Attached 2. Events Update – Attached Bar/Events Report 3. Staff - Oral Report

II.

ADJOURNMENT

Page 1 of 1

April 19 , 2021 Legal A. Quick Orientation- Legal Counsel to Attend B. Petitions- Legal Counsel a. Monarch Ball- Attached b. Can/Am Tournament- Attached

This petition requests that the Board of Directors rescind their decision which allowed the use of the Monarch ball on the ORPS pickleball courts. The reasons for this request follow. The Board authorized a pickleball trial to be conducted from 1 November 2015 to 29 February 2016. Various balls were used including the Onix Foam Quiet ball. An advisory vote was approved for inclusion in the spring 2016 Board election. The advisory vote asked owners if they approved establishing pickleball courts on two contiguous tennis courts at either ES or LP, under 5 conditions. The first condition was that only the quiet ball or equivalent, as demonstrated during the pickleball trial, will be used. It is clear that the Board included this condition recognizing that sound mitigation provided by the quiet ball was necessary due to the close confines of surrounding residences and facilities and was required in order to gain the owners approval of the project. In February and March of 2019 in-house tests were conducted with alternative balls in an attempt to find a standard ball whose acoustic emissions would be equivalent to the quiet ball and included attempts to employ portable sound mitigation. These tests were not considered to be conclusive; in June 2019 the Board authorized management to contract with an acoustic consultant to carry out a pickleball sound study. The stated objective of the study was to “test sound levels on our courts using currently approved equipment to establish a baseline, alternative USAPA-approved quiet balls, and recommend sound mitigation options that could be implemented to bring sound levels of alternative balls to acceptable levels”. The USAPA-approved quiet ball was the Monarch ball. The sound study was conducted November 13, and a report was issued on December 15. The December 16 Board meeting included an agenda item to review the test results. Board members had less than 24 hours to acquaint themselves with the contents and conclusions of the report. After discussion of noise issues and possible noise mitigation, the Board approved the Monarch ball for use from 8:00 am to 4:00 pm every day. The ORPS Rules and Regulations were modified to reflect this decision on December 16, the same day as the Board’s decision. The Consultant’s report was not posted to the ORPS website for access by the owners until after this decision was made. The ORPS Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions require that prior to adopting a Rule Change, the wording of the proposed change must be posted as a general notice for 28 days to allow resort owners the opportunity to review the change and provide input to the Board. Rule changes can only be made after consideration of comments from the resort owners.

The decision should be reversed as there were a number of flaws evident in the decision process:

 The Consultant’s report concluded that the Monarch ball is 5 to 7 dBA louder than the quiet ball and can not be considered as equivalent to the quiet ball. This decision therefor contravenes the first condition of the Advisory Vote.  The Board made their decision without taking the time for the comprehensive review of the report required to fully understand the extent of the noise issue.  The decision was made without having received from the Consultant any recommendations specific to the Monarch ball.  Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised.  Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation.

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Ronald Gookin Lot # 1153 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

107.77.229.12

4939077892193042530

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Madeline Furman Lot # 1159 Signature

Submission IP

174.0.239.48

4938958648494942748

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Judy Hesse Lot # 1102 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

174.4.242.184

4938344444811435349

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Barry Pollock Lot # 273 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

174.0.18.147

4937188597417050139

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Sandy Glennie Lot # 1210 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

76.171.222.48

4936342138426090867

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Kelly Walker Lot # 1204 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

76.171.222.48

4936341068429689287

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Wendy Van den Brink Lot # 1124 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

70.78.213.122

4936192662219556196

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Marilyn Sabens Lot # 1056 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

107.77.215.117

4936084627116123161

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Robert Boyce Lot # 233 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

73.181.187.137

4935457927312393750

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Robert Boyce Lot # 615 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

73.181.187.137

4935457467316076723

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Robert Boyce Lot # 669 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

73.181.187.137

4935456897312009047

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Patrick Killion Lot # 1029 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

98.125.171.65

4934553305618336160

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Ken Smith Lot # 1166 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

72.132.213.9

4933754319319130473

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Leo Walsh Lot # 1203 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

72.132.198.66

4933615206687431703

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Evelyn Neave Lot # 275 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

70.67.202.165

4932177565613777783

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Marilyn Riley Lot # 663 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

72.132.191.27

4932036107213215136

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Richard Whitman Lot # 742 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

172.56.16.11

4932035551165421234

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Frank Koole Lot # 629 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

70.75.118.84

4931792254887417490

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Elizabeth West Lot # 633 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

72.132.201.207

4931341987022371138

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Monty Feyen Lot # 1071 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

72.219.157.82

4931038452879133145

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Susan Thomas Lot # 1090 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

72.132.192.155

4930896575515546821

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Ron Schmidt Lot # 11 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

198.254.165.35

4930656855353198960

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Rick Gelormino Lot # 841 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

174.243.192.116

4930372986113531617

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name JoAnne Maurer Lot # 306 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

50.199.129.13

4930271093192403132

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name stephen michaels Lot # 117 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

174.193.163.253

4930200253528526360

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Adriana Silva Lot # 1137 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

76.90.247.192

4930160302916032070

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Robert Raymond Lot # 960 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

98.232.73.169

4930143869611160670

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Ron Langdon Lot # 262 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

174.195.204.244

4930124984423395090

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Suzanne Strauss Lot # 632 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

72.132.214.105

4930120085019649701

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Gloria Herder Lot # 172 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

98.221.223.37

4930078857337708487

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Evelyn Neave Lot # 275 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

50.92.37.212

4929716742124135410

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Charles Condon Lot # 1047 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

205.250.165.142

4929675102417745582

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Jan Ryan Lot # 626 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

72.132.221.193

4929646453919916285

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Barbara Delgado Lot # 1170 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

47.150.246.195

4929642225913094068

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Natalie Weber Lot # 189 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

72.132.205.78

4929629128759257213

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Marshall Ellis Lot # 1126 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

209.53.248.34

4929605454388425877

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Linda Seiler Lot # 926 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

72.132.202.219

4929604449127744741

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Stan Lindell Lot # 499 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

67.52.171.66

4929586896616960035

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Frank Cukjati Lot # 303 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

73.90.119.30

4929584680397178637

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Betty Pisto Lot # 292 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

96.54.24.17

4929568407143507045

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Alec Bayes Lot # 634 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

104.157.11.158

4929549088518138790

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Denise Miller Lot # 996 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

24.207.52.18

4929545298122568202

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Margot Baur Lot # 899 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

50.92.121.111

4929530931119561742

2

Members had no opportunity to review the Consultant’s report and provide input before the decision was made and the Rules and Regulations revised. Members had no opportunity to review the rule change prior to its adoption as required by the resort CC&R. There is ample experience illustrating the problems that occur when pickleball facilities are constructed too close to residential areas. In ORPS case, it is not just the owners around the pickleball courts that are affected. All of the members who utilize the ES facilities share in the annoyance resulting from the pickleball noise. Disregarding this evidence will result in growing irritation and dissatisfaction among affected members, with a high probability of an expensive legal challenge. The intent of this petition is to avoid such an outcome and to eliminate the requirement for expensive and undesirable noise mitigation. Name Rogers Harder Lot # 772 E-mail [email protected] Signature

Submission IP

174.243.197.81

4929525901876059726

2