Data Loading...
Mission Measurement Social Impact Study 2016
29 Downloads
855.77 KB
Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Copy link
RECOMMEND FLIP-BOOKS
Mission Measurement Report
Mission Measurement Report Free The Children Social Impact Study – Prepared for Parent Audiences Mar
Mission Measurement WE Villages Research Report
programs produce complimentary, reinforcing outcomes The purpose of this study is to examine the mod
FY16 Social Bonds Impact Report
aip. On an annual basis, IFC will publish the list of projects which have received funding from Soci
FY20 Social Bond Impact Report
or promoting: A Affordable basic infrastructure (e.g. clean drinking water, sewers, sanitation, t
FY21 Social Bond Impact Report
or promoting: A Affordable basic infrastructure (e.g., clean drinking water, sewers, sanitation,
FY19 Social Bond Impact Report
>Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page
Measurement
Measurement Measurement Contents Measurement .......................................................
FY17 Social Bond Impact Report
978-1-4648-1096-1. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO For finance figures, see : De
FY18 Social Bond Impact Report
7 Number of outstanding loans to women-owned SMEs is not a HIPSO indicator 19 Social Bond Eligible P
2021 Nebraska Social Impact Report (Foundation)
2021 Nebraska Social Impact Report (Foundation) Social impact report: 2021 One of our core beliefs a
WE Social Impact Study Highlights and Insights Conducted by Mission Measurement
The Study Assessed the Extent to Which WE Produced Priority Outcomes Aligned to the Learning Framework
Empower Young People to Become Active Local, National, and Global Citizens
Impact Statement
Instilling Active Citizenship
Improving University and Workplace Readiness
Increasing Academic Engagement
▪
Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Collaboration and Inclusion
▪
Inquiry
▪
Knowledge Acquisition Local, National, Global Interconnections Youth Initiative and Entrepreneurship Interest in Learning* Academic Readiness*
▪
▪
▪
Participation
▪
Learning Goals
Sustained Learning
▪
▪
Communication
▪
Personal Responsibility
▪
▪
Leadership
Empathy
▪
Self-Esteem and Optimism*
▪
▪
* Denotes additional themes not currently incorporated in the Learning Framework that were tested because MM identified them as areas of WE impact through primary qualitative research
We Assessed Impact by Surveying WE and Non-WE Youth and Educators
Audience
• Youth:
• Youth:
• 13-18 not involved with WE, in Illinois and California • Matched and weighted on Age, Gender, Parental Education, Free or Reduced Lunch (FRL) status, Race/Ethnicity
• 13-18 involved with WE Schools / WE Day in Illinois and California • Focused on youth involved for at least a year or who engage with organization at least weekly
WE
Non-WE
• Educators
• Educators
Analysis
Comparison of ( delta ) WE and Non-WE responses 1
Youth attribution of WE impact
(Δ)
Retrospective Pre-Post Analysis of WE impact
Educator attribution of WE impact
1: All comparative >Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online